Runyon's expertise, does it know no bounds?

This post is going to be rather brief due partly to illness and partly to my workload. I simply wanted to present the brilliant legal mind of Benton genius, Robert Runyon. Here, he provides a clear and succinct argument to avoid a local landlord ordinance that has recently been passed in the area. For your enjoyment and without further ado:

How to recapture your flag

When I was a child growing up in Almedia, about four miles north of Bloomsburg, all the kids throughout the community used to get together in the fall and play a game called "Capture the Flag." We would divide into groups of five persons per flag, most times we would have four flags, sometimes enough kids showed up to have as many as 10 flags. Each group, or flag, elected a leader, whose job it was to remain with the flag to protect it against capture. The other four would go out to try to capture the opponents' flags and return them to hang from your flag pole. As a flag was captured, it lost its sovereignty and its players would serve its new master, under a new flag and became compelled to join in capturing other opponents' flags, bringing them under new sovereignty and the game ended when all flags flew under one sovereignty.

Kind of reminds me of WE THEE PEOPLE, born equally free and independent, with inalienable and indefeasible rights. Citizens of Article III jurisdiction, U.S. Constitution, and Article I, Pennsylvania Constitution, and upon closer inspection I must conclude WE THEE PEOPLE'S flag has been captured somewhere along the way.

Further study reveals that by THEE own hand with the final stroke of THEE pen we have set seal against our "Personam" and become "In Personam," as we have unwittingly placed ourselves and our children under a sow's ear; U.S. Constitution Article I and Article II jurisdiction and the inferior courts. Fear not! There is remedy and can be attained at "Without Prejudice" UCC 1- 207 and can be found in the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, Uniform Commercial Code (Title 13) Chapter 12 § 1207 / performance or acceptance under reservation of rights.

Upon inspection of the new Landlord ordinance By the Borough Council of Berwick, I find it most funny if it weren't for reason that I see the horrible fact that more of THEE PEOPLE'S flags are being surrendered to the sow's ear (City Hall) by the simple fact of entering in and subjecting themselves to the unthinkable, without the protections of and securing for themselves their Article III rights by simply placing above their signature "Without Prejudice" UCC-1-207.

To the Landlords and tenants that hath any understanding, take note that becoming agents of the sow's ear (City Hall) or an agent thereof that acts in an inappropriate manner against an Article III jurisdiction citizen who has reserved his rights without prejudice will have the sow's ear at Title 18 law.

To those who wish to remain under the jurisdiction of the sow, go in peace as you have the right to do so. To those who wish to throw the chains of the sow and dwell in the land of Article III citizenship, where your inalienable and indefeasible rights are secured in the knowledge that the sow's ear will meet with God's Law (Common Law), where citizens are of right and not privilege and that the sow's ear to act can meet its fate at Title 18, I say welcome and learn to secure THEE flag!

"Without Prejudice UCC 1- 207"

ROBERT RUNYON

Nescopeck

The Patriot's Voice

Robert Runyon, Ltr. to the Ed., How to recapture your flag, The Press Enterprise (Sept. 11, 2007).

Armed with an unstoppable legal mind, I'm surprised this word-smith is not right now arguing cases before the Supreme Ct. for some objective, well-respected legal group, like the ADF, the ACLJ, or the Thomas More Law Center. I'll comment more on this later, but for now I will simply state that he did not completely butcher everything, though I would not trying appealing to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in any ct., since you instead have to check to ensure that those sections of the UCC that are being cited to have been ratified by the state in question. Thankfully (and surprisingly), Runyon did mention the correct statute that codifies this provision of the UCC, even if he butchered the citation. 13 Pa.C.S.A. section 1207 did ratify section 1-207 of the UCC.

I'll touch more on this tomorrow perhaps, needless to say there are certainly a few problems.